Data Act

05 maggio 2022


On May 4, 2022, EDPB-EDPS issued their Joint Opinion 2/2022 on the Proposal of the European Parliament and of the Council on harmonised rules on fair access to and use of data (Data Act)

With this Joint Opinion, the EDPB and the EDPS aim to draw attention to a number of overarching concerns on the Proposal on Data Act and urge the co-legislature to take decisive action.

The EDPB and EDPS note that the Proposal would apply to a broad range of products and services, including the connected objects (‘Internet of Things’), medical or health devices and virtual assistants. Certain products and services may even process special categories of personal data, such as data concerning health or biometric data.

As the Proposal does not explicitly exclude certain types of data of data from its scope, data revealing highly sensitive information about individuals could become the object of data sharing and use according to the rules established in the Proposal.

While welcoming the efforts made to ensure that the Proposal does not affect the current data protection framework, the EDPB and the EDPS consider that additional safeguards are necessary to avoid lowering the protection of the fundamental rights to privacy and to the protection of personal data in practice.

First, additional safeguards are especially necessary as the rights to access, use and share data under the Proposal would likely extend to entities other than the data subjects, including businesses, depending on the legal title under which the device is being used. Second, the EDPB and EDPS are deeply concerned by the provisions of the Proposal regarding the obligation to make data available to public sector bodies and Union institutions, agencies or bodies in case of “exceptional need”. Finally, the EDPB and the EDPS are concerned that the oversight mechanism established by the Proposal may lead to fragmented and incoherent supervision.

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

lug20

20/07/2026

Ente Nazionale per l'Aviazione Civile

Modalità di reclamo per negato imbarco, cancellazione e ritardo prolungato del volo   In caso di di negato imbarco, cancellazione del volo o ritardo prolungato

lug20

20/07/2026

Autorita' di regolazione dei trasporti

ART per la tutela dei diritti ART, in qualità di regolatore indipendente, definisce anche il contenuto minimo dei diritti degli utenti nei confronti dei gestori dei servizi e delle

lug20

20/07/2026

Sentenza della Corte nella causa C-421/24 | AGCOM (Gioco d’azzardo online)

er la Corte di Giustizia dell'Ue, la  Piattaforme multimediali Google può essere ritenuta responsabile per i video YouTube di un creatore di contenuti vincolato da una partnership

News Giuridiche

ago9

09/08/2026

L'AI che hai spento non è sparita

<p class="p1" style="color: #000000;

ago8

08/08/2026

Diritto di difesa e segretezza delle indagini nell'ecosistema investigativo digitale

La formazione della conoscenza investigativa

ago7

07/08/2026

Volo in ritardo o cancellato: la pronuncia del Giudice di Pace di Venezia

<p>Il <a href="https://onelegale.wolterskluwer.it/document/10SE0003205498"